Paul Emile Lecoq de Boisbaudran

De Boisbaudran belonged to the ancient Protestant nobility of considerable fortune, which, however, disappeared after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. The property of de Boisbaudran was sold; and his father Paul started a wine business at Cognac. The venture required the energy of the entire family, including young Lecoq. His mother was well educated and taught him history and foreign languages, so he was fluent in English. He also studied some courses of the École Polytechnique by reading the syllabus and fitted up a modest laboratory, where he began to repeat the experiments which he had read in books. In this laboratory he made most of his early discoveries, including the isolation of gallium.

De Boisbaudran’s early work focused on supersaturation of solutions. He showed that supersaturation is destroyed by contact with crystals of an isomorphous salt, and that it is possible to prepare solutions of anhydrous salts in a supersaturated condition (1866–1869). In 1874 he found that octahedral faces are less readily soluble than cubic faces for ammonium alum crystals. His chief work, however, was in spectroscopy and its application to rare earth elements. He analysed spectra of 35 elements, using the Bunsen burner, electric spark or both to induce luminescence and in this way discovered the lanthanides samarium (1880), dysprosium (1886) and europium (1890). He also isolated gadolinium in 1885, the element which was previously discovered in 1880 by J.C. Galissard de Marignac.

The most notable work of de Boisbaudran was, however, discovery of gallium. In 1875 he had obtained several milligrams of gallium chloride, extracted from a sample of 52 kg of mineral ore, and found new spectroscopic lines in it. He continued the experiments using several hundred kilograms of zinc ore from the Pyrenees and in the same year isolated more than one gram of the pure metal by electrolysing a solution of its hydroxide in potassium hydroxide. Later he prepared 75 grams of gallium using more than 4 tonnes of the ore. De Boisbaudran calculated the atomic weight of gallium as 69.86, close to the currently accepted value of 69.723. For this work, he received the cross of the Cross of the Legion of Honour, the Davy Medal (1879) and the Prix Lacaze of 10,000 francs. He was elected a foreign member of the Royal Society in 1888. It was later claimed that Lecoq had named the element after himself, since gallus is the Latin translation of the French le coq, but Lecoq denied this in an article of 1877 and asserted that the name originates from Latin for Gaul, Gallia. The existence of gallium had been predicted during 1871 by Dmitri Mendeleev, who called it eka-aluminium, and its discovery was a boost for Mendeleev’s theory of the periodic table.

Lecoq contributed more to the development of the periodic classification of elements by proposing, soon after its discovery, that argon was a member of a new, previously unsuspected, chemical series of elements, later to become known as the noble gases. After 1895, family duties and failing health hindered his work. His suffered from anchylosis of the joints and passed away in 1912, at the age of seventy-four.

via Paul Emile Lecoq de Boisbaudran

This entry was posted in Biography, Chemistry. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Paul Emile Lecoq de Boisbaudran

  1. Dr. Eric Scerri says:

    Thank you for a very interesting account. I was especially taken by the passage,

    “Lecoq contributed more to the development of the periodic classification of elements by proposing, soon after its discovery, that argon was a member of a new, previously unsuspected, chemical series of elements, later to become known as the noble gases.”

    Do you by any chance have a citation for this that I might follow up?

    Eric Scerri
    ericscerri.com/

    • Deskarati says:

      I do not have any citation apart from an interesting paragraph in William Hodson Brock’s book on the life of William Crookes which mentions that Leqoc was the first to try and predict the atomic weight relationship of argon to other elements. – Deskarati

  2. Dr. Eric Scerri says:

    Thank you for the reference which I will look into.

    An interesting thing about the noble gases is that Mendeleev failed to predict their existence. Whether or not Crookes did is a matter of some controversy. I wonder whether you might get in touch with me via regular E-mail Deskarati? We have much to discuss. Again, I think your website is superb.

    ericscerri.com/

  3. Deskarati says:

    Thank you for your warm comments they are very much appreciated. But please note that I am just an interested amateur in these matters and would feel unable to offer any intelligent insights. What I shall be doing is checking out your work, it sounds most interesting.

Comments are closed.