Galaxy classification is out of tune, say astronomers

The way galaxies have been classified for decades has been questioned by an international team of astronomers. After revealing that two-thirds of local elliptical galaxies are actually fast-spinning discs, the team has suggested that the Hubble “tuning fork” – the long-standing method for classifying galaxies – may need retuning.

Galaxies come in all shapes and sizes: from flat spinning discs to almost-stationary blob-like elliptical galaxies. However, accurately classifying these huge objects can sometimes be tricky due to the angle from which they are observed. When seen face-on, older disc galaxies that have lost their distinctive dust lanes and spirals can masquerade as equally featureless, but spherical, elliptical galaxies. Elliptical galaxies are thought to have very little net rotation whereas disc galaxies rotate much faster. Measuring their rotation speed can therefore help distinguish between them.

Such a test has been performed using the ATLAS3D survey, led by Michele Cappellari at the University of Oxford, UK. The survey consists of 260 non-spiral galaxies in the nearby universe. “We divided each galaxy up into a grid and took spectra for each individual section,” Cappellari told physicsworld.com. “By analysing these spectra we could measure the red-shift, or the blue-shift, of each section,” he adds. If an area shows a red-shift, it is moving away from us; if it shows a blue-shift, it is coming towards us. If one limb of a galaxy is red-shifted and the opposite limb is blue-shifted then the galaxy must be rotating, and you can measure how fast.

What surprised Cappellari and his colleagues was that 66% of the galaxies previously classified as elliptical were now shown by ATLAS3D to be fast-rotating discs. “Two-thirds of these galaxies are essentially no different from spirals that have had the gas and dust removed – they are ‘naked’ spirals,” Cappellari explains. “Such a large fraction is not something one can ignore; it brings a significant change to our understanding of galaxy formation,” he continues. This had led the team to make a distinction between non-spiral galaxies: the conventional ellipticals are “slow rotators” and the naked spirals are “fast rotators”.

The result is threatening to overturn more than 80 years of conventional wisdom. Astronomers currently classify galaxies using a “tuning fork” diagram constructed by Edwin Hubble in the mid-1920s. His fork has non-spiral galaxies forming the handle, with the two different flavours of spiral galaxies – those with and those without barred centres – constituting the prongs. However, Cappellari’s result shows that fast rotators may be more closely related to spirals than previously thought. “We feel our result could re-write the way textbooks on galaxy structure are written,” he says.

via Galaxy classification is out of tune, say astronomers

This entry was posted in Cosmology. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Galaxy classification is out of tune, say astronomers

  1. alfy says:

    A beautiful posting visually, Jim, but also a highly significant piece of astronomy. We are possibly about to see a paradigm shift. The first stage in a branch of science is collecting as much information as possible. (The pic of all the galaxy types). The second stage is to try to classify the various types using whichever criteria seem most appropriate. The third stage is to try to derive some basic principles from the classified material.

    It needs to be remembered that scientists do not work on each of the three stages to the exclusion of all else. While they are collecting, (Stage 1) they will be speculating about possible basic principles (Stage 3)

    What seems to be happening with regard to galaxies is that a hitherto acceptable classification method, the “Hubble-Tuning Fork” has been shown to be inadequate. A new classification method is likely to reveal much more fundamental principles than the earlier paradigm.

    Hence the idea of a paradigm shift. Perhaps a posting on this very topic might be of interest. Illustrations of paradigm shifts in the 20C include;

    1. The realisation in the first decade of the 20 C, that the periodic table classification needed to be based on atomic number and not atomic weight, (due to the British chemist, Moseley, killed in WWI if I remember correctly)

    2. The realisation in the 1960s that the continents of the earth are in constant motion as a means of explaining a large number of hitherto in explicable geological phenomena like “the ring of fire” or the presence of deepest ocean trenches close to the shores of continents.
    3. The realisation in the 1960s, that so many phenomena in genetics, previously understood only at a macroscopic level could now be explained in terms of the structure changes occurring in the DNA molecule.

Comments are closed.